circuitnet
Sponsor
SEHO Systems GmbH
You need clear soldering results?
The SEHO PowerVision AOI system is for fast, automated optical inspection. Designed for THT processes & focusses on 2 points: Continuous quality assurance & cost-efficient production processes.
SEHO Systems GmbH
Introducing New Board-to-Board Connectors
Sponsor
Circuit Technology Center
The Right Tools for Every PCB Repair
Damaged circuit boards don't always need to be replaced. CircuitMedic offers professional-grade repair kits, tools, and materials for restoring damaged pads, traces, plated holes, and circuit board surfaces.
Circuit Technology Center
Ask the Experts
QUESTIONS
  
SUBMIT
  
MEMBERS
  
JOIN
October 28, 2009 - Updated
October 26, 2009 - Originally Posted

Class 2 vs. Class 3 Distinction

Can you point to empirical data that distinguishes between the performance differences of IPC Class 2 and Class 3 PCBs? If you can point to any data can you offer a simple explaination of the difference?
J. K.
Expert Panel Responses
The first definition is the differences between the two classes of products where class 2 and class 3 differences are based upon system up-time. Class 2 products are defined as products where continued performance and extended life is required, and for which uninterrupted service is desired but not critical. Whereas Class 3 products demand continued high performance or performance-on-demand is critical and equipment downtime cannot be tolerated, the end use environment may be uncommonly harsh, and the equipment must function when required, such as life support or other critical systems. By reviewing the requirements of Class 3, within the IPC documents the differences are found in component placement for surface mount components, hole fill requirements for plated through holes, cleanliness requirements based upon residual contaminants on the surface of the product, plating thicknesses as defined in plated through holes and on the surfaces of printed circuit boards. Although there are many other differences, these are ones which come to mind quickly. These individual issues can impact the performance requirements of Class 3 product, hindering their ability to function on demand. A couple of examples that come to mind are a pacemaker, which has to work immediately and down time cannot be tolerated or a rocket on the wing of an aircraft has to fire when activated and its downtime cannot be tolerated. Is there any data signifying the improvements in product functionality for these issues? The answer is yes, but would have to be dug out of the archives to get to the specifics of each one. Class 3 informational criteria is only included in the documents when sufficient informational data has been supplied and approved by the various document committees.

Leo Lambert
Leo Lambert
Vice President, Technical Director, EPTAC Corporation
At EPTAC Corporation, Mr. Lambert oversees content of course offerings, IPC Certification programs and provides customers with expert consultation in electronics manufacturing, including RoHS/WEEE and lead free issues. Leo is also the IPC General Chairman for the Assembly/Joining Process Committee.
Submit A Comment
Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company
Your E-mail


Your Country
Your Comments



Free Newsletter Subscription
Circuitnet is built for professionals who bear the responsibility of looking ahead, imagining the future, and preparing for it.

Insert Your Email Address

Sponsor
BEST Inc.
Bring IPC Training to Your Facility
Mobile training center offers IPC certified classes at your company’s facility making solder training effective and convenient for your entire team.
BEST Inc.
Focus on Storage Solutions -post APEX